Home » Exercise & Fitness » Trump’s vision for American health care, explained by his budget

Trump’s vision for American health care, explained by his budget

Democratic presidential candidates have spent years building a new vision of American policy, one where a lot more of us get our health insurance from the government.

I see President Trump’s newly released budget as his counterproposal to all that. It envisions a really different future, one where government-run health care shrinks — and public programs become more difficult to sign up for.

You Might Like

Here are some key health policy features of the Trump budget (you can read the full thing here):

  • Repealing Obamacare and replacing it with Graham-Cassidy. Those who followed the Obamacare repeal debate closely will certainly remember the replacement proposal from Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) and Bill Cassidy (R-LA). As I’ve written previously, this plan would allow insurers to discriminate against those with preexisting conditions and significantly cut insurance subsidies for low- and middle-income Americans.
  • Cutting $845 billion from Medicare. These are some pretty significant cuts that are already getting a lot of attention. To be honest, I don’t see them as the most notable part of this budget. As Axios’s Sam Baker points out, a big chunk of these Medicare cuts are ones that have bipartisan backing — so much so that they the Obama administration proposed them in years past. Even Obamacare cut Medicare by $716 billion — something Republicans continually brought up in the 2012 election. At the same time, there are certain changes in the budget that could have a negative impact for patients: for example, the budget proposes requiring prior authorization for certain medical procedures that are likely to be the subject of fraud — which could make it harder for seniors to get care.
  • A nationwide work requirement for Medicaid. Republican governors in places like Arkansas and Wisconsin have recently begun requiring their Medicaid enrollees to work, go to school, or be job-searching in order to qualify for health benefits. The idea is to use the medical coverage as an incentive to get more Americans to join the workforce — but early data (primarily from Arkansas) suggests that these types of work requirements can be difficult to comply with, and people who really rely on their Medicaid plans are starting to lose coverage. The Trump budget would create a nationwide Medicaid work requirement that would save the government an estimated $245 billion — cuts that would likely come from fewer Americans getting coverage through the program.
  • Bigger copayments in Medicaid too. The Trump budget proposes “additional flexibility around benefits and cost-sharing, such as increasing copayments for non-emergency use of the emergency department.” We know from a lengthy body of health policy research that when you have higher costs associated with health care, patients cut back on their doctor trips — both the ones are needed and those that aren’t quite so necessary. You’d expect that a change like this might cut back on some unnecessary ER visits, but it’s also going to deter patients from seeking emergency care in cases where they really need it.
  • No more premium-free Obamacare plans. In many parts of the country, low-income Americans qualify for “zero premium” insurance plans: health coverage where the entire premium would be covered by their government tax credit. The Trump administration wants to put an end to that. In order to “increase consumer engagement,” the White House proposes that “all subsidized individuals that purchase health coverage on the Federal Exchange to contribute something to their healthcare coverage.” How exactly this would happen is not made clear in the budget proposal.

Higher copayments, work requirements, no more zero-premium Obamacare plans — take it all together and you create a health care system where it’s significantly harder and more expensive to go to the doctor.

There are some benefits to this type of health care system, no doubt. When fewer people get public coverage — and those remaining people go to the doctor less because their copays are higher — then the government spends less money on health care. So if your biggest goal is reducing the deficit, this plan would check that box.

But those spending cuts come with some undeniable human consequences. Bryce Covert recently wrote a compelling piece for the Nation, exploring the human consequences of Arkansas’s new Medicaid work requirement. One of the things she finds is that those who are having trouble keeping up with the bureaucracy of the work requirement — who are working but haven’t properly reported that to the state — are struggling to hold on to their coverage.

What we’re seeing right now is two really different visions of the future of American health care. We have one from the Democrats that envisions a robust health care system, one without any copayments or deductibles. There are still holes in that vision — namely, how to pay for such a generous version of American health care — and I’d guess these proposals get revised to include some type of cost sharing as they work their way through Congress. All that being said, what Democrats are offering right now is a clear vision of how they think medical care should be in the United States: easily affordable and accessible to all Americans.

The other vision offered today by the Trump administration lays out a future where the government spends less on health care — and, as a result, vulnerable populations get less medical care.

This vision does not come with the difficult “how do you pay for it” questions that plague any Medicare-for-all proposal. But it comes with its own big question: namely, how are low-income Americans going to get by in a country where they get a lot less help affording basic medical services?

The answer to that question is probably that they don’t get by very well. The future the Trump budget lays out is one in which richer Americans can do just fine buying their own health care. There aren’t big changes for those who get insurance at work, as higher-income Americans typically do. But it’s a future where, if you’re poor, seeking care gets a lot harder.

About pulsedaily

8 comments

  1. Any middle class adult or senior who votes Republican is voting against theirs & their families best interests Never Trump

  2. Never Trump or Republicans

  3. You are wrong. Medicare is funded by the people we all that work comes out of our pay check. So I’m not sure what the cuts you speak of are, maybe your talking about Medicare. Just like social security it is funded by the working people. They are not entitlements and if the government keeps giving it to every Tom, dick, and harry. It wouldn’t go broke and by the way how many billions has the government borrowed From it? Now they may need to repay what they stole from it. 2nd of all the government should have never stuck there nose in Healthcare it’s not in the constitution, nor is the dept of education. But should be addressed by the states. All of this just means more government less freedoms.

  4. I always thought 20 dollar copay for dr visit and 100 dollar copay for emergency room would be a good Medicare Medicade private insurance policy.this could come from income tax refund from the poor and cash from the rest of us.

  5. Cutting $845 billion from Medicare,This should not be taken from Medicare that is being paid for by the
    people for there medical needs. The government shuold be paying bake to the people they confiscated
    billens from not staeling more!

  6. Gayle Alexander

    When I was a kid you did not have the opportunity to go to doctors we have now. Grandmothers had old pioneer knowledge of what worked for most of what happened to us. I am now in my late eighties and in better health than many who are in this age bracket.

  7. There are reason why should cut Medicare and Medicaid because, I been turn down or get yell at all dentist and hearring aids place. So sad, sure help ones good hearring but ones can’t hear very clear sound get push away for years. At age 55. Since loss my job back 2004. Nothing but problems on get help is needed. Most single got pay more out there pocket not health insurance don’t cover. Not right in today world. Should be lower health insurance for low income single, since cost living takes more out my pocket each year. Time have better health insurance for low income wages. Cut cost on rent or townhouse by 100%. Let’s help poor single person,, not hurt them. So tired get push away because of dentist needed more work, can’t turn away. In small town area, can’t afford take bus far away places not know going make back home again. Sure easy on others not me is but stressful each day and years.

  8. Dangerous neuro technology is being used to hack, control, and torture innocent people around the world. This is a factual statement. You probably, or may not believe this right now, but my hope is by the conclusion of this lecture this evening you might be more convinced.

    I want you to imagine a world where people sit behind computers with security clearances and listen to your most personal thoughts, spy on your most private moments, and actually control your mind and body.

    This is not science fiction.

    This is reality.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWhcwVmdrR4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*